This white paper provides a summary of presentations, discussions and conclusions of a Thinktank entitled “The Role of Endpoint Adjudication in Medical Device Clinical Trials”. The think tank was cosponsored by the Cardiac Safety Research Committee, MDEpiNet and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and was convened at the FDA's White Oak headquarters on March 11, 2016. Attention was focused on tailoring best practices for evaluation of endpoints in medical device clinical trials, practical issues in endpoint adjudication of therapeutic, diagnostic, biomarker and drug-device combinations, and the role of adjudication in regulatory and reimbursement issues throughout the device lifecycle. Attendees included representatives from medical device companies, the FDA, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), end point adjudication specialist groups, clinical research organizations, and active, academically based adjudicators. The manuscript presents recommendations from the think tank regarding (1) rationale for when adjudication is appropriate, (2) best practices establishment and operation of a medical device adjudication committee and (3) the role of endpoint adjudication for post market evaluation in the emerging era of real world evidence. (Am Heart J 2017;190:76-85.)
New Blog: "Ask the IRB Experts"Visit Blog
Other content in this Stream
A Fresh Perspective from the FDA on the Final IND Safety Reporting Rule
WCG’s SafetyVigilance® Online Safety Event Solution Delivers Quality and Efficiency to Unify Enterprise Trial Management and Meet Regional Guidelines and Regulations
Our experts teamed-up to take on your safety questions and provide you with tactics and strategies to overcome the biggest challenges plaguing your studies today.
Custom-built to streamline the adjudication process, the AIMS platform allows for enhanced endpoint adjudication capabilities.
From cardiovascular adverse events to complex dosing regimens, oncology trials present unique safety-related considerations.
Something Has to Give: The Current Unsustainable Approach to Safety Reporting Puts Trials and Patients at Risk